weboholic.de

random rant-o-rama

Archive for November, 2007

about: GMail

without comments

Здравей, Гугъл, почитател на ГМейл ти пише.

Съжалявам, че трябва и аз като други да ти кажа, но и при мен има ГМейл/Файърфокс катастрофи. Файърбъг е деактивирин, както поиска, но въпреки това от време на време Файърфоксhas experienced a crash and must be closed. Последната капка бе преди малко, когато ГМейл бе единствения отворен таб.

Моля, не ме карай да сменям пощата.

Благодаря.
Никола Иванов

Written by Никола

November 30th, 2007 at 9:25 am

Можеш ли да Назовеш 91 HTML4 Елемента за 5 Минути?

without comments

Аз назовах 58 от всичките 91 елемента в HTML 4. Това е среден резултат. Сетих се някои рядко ползвани тагове като <address> and <q>, но пропуснах някои от най-срещаните – <fieldset> and <label>. Срамота, самота.

Тъй, ти как ще се справиш? [от]

Written by Никола

November 20th, 2007 at 9:24 am

Posted in Препънки

Tagged with

Цитат: JavaScript

without comments

If you are writing applications in Java, you do not have to be prepared for having Java turned off. But because of the browser’s long and tragic history of security screwups, JavaScript does get turned off. It is ultimately the only security control given to users that works. So not only does the programmer have to be prepared for failure, the program is expected to fail gracefully.

Дъглас Крокфорд

Written by Никола

November 12th, 2007 at 9:22 am

Posted in Цитати

Tagged with

Semantics of Breadcrumbs and TOCs

without comments

Imagine a several-leveled TOC. Now consider the W3C definitions. What would be the correct list markup for the TOC – an <ul> or an <ol>. And what would be the correct markup for breadcrumbs – an <ul> or an <ol>? Or something else?

Update 05.11: I’ve spent some time this weekend googling this question and I found out, that people tend to style breadcrumbs with <div>’s and TOC’s with <ul>’s. This is in my opinion incorrect. I would use <ul> for breadcrumbs and <ol> for a TOC.
Breadcrumbs are a representation of an ordered levels inside a hierarchy, but they don’t prescribe the navigation inside this hierarchy. Indeed same is valid also for the table of contents, but in this case I think it should be an ordered list, because you have to read chapters 3 and 4, and all of their sub-chapters in order to fully understand chapters 10 and 11.

So, I think, I’ll go with <ul> and <ol>.

P.S. I think it’s both sad and hilarious, that the microformatswiki uses <td> and <br> to markup the TOC on the page entitled “Semantic (X)HTML”.

Update 05.11: TOCs on W3C are marked up with <ol>’s, so I’ll be definitely using ordered lists.

Written by Никола

November 2nd, 2007 at 9:20 am

Писъмце от Университета

without comments

Получих вчера, 01.11.2007, това писъмце от университета ми:. 

tudmail

Пише:

… Сертификатът Ви изтича идните дни (18.10.2007) … 

Хе-хе? Идните дни, а?

:)

Written by Никола

November 2nd, 2007 at 9:19 am

Clicky Web Analytics